Market Anomaly: Bear Raid (spot-based)
In short: A Bear Raid (Spot) is an aggressively orchestrated sell sequence in the cash market that rapidly clears bid-side depth, blows out the spread and pushes the mid-price well below the 30-day baseline - typically marked by sell-aggressor dominance, waves of bid cancels and cross-venue propagation. Pro traders: sell aggressor share ≫ 50%, bid-depth ratio → P1, extended down-tick runs, spread jumps with shortened best-bid half-life; stop-runs and short reversions frequently follow without a fundamental catalyst.
Documented Scenarios (CEX-based)
- 21 Jun 2017 – ETH flash crash on GDAX/Coinbase Pro (spot): A very large market sell triggered stop cascades within seconds; ETH briefly dropped from ~296 USD to near 0.10 USD, then recovered. Intent unclear; exchange statements & press coverage (Business Insider, Fortune).
- 21 Oct 2021 – BTC flash crash on Binance.US (spot): BTC fell to 8,200 USD within a minute and rebounded immediately; the exchange blamed an algorithmic bug. Bear-raid-like impulse without proven malicious intent (CoinDesk / Bloomberg).
- 08 Mar 2018 – Mt. Gox trustee sell-offs: Large spot distributions by the trustee coincided with downward phases; causality/intention debated. Concentrated spot selling correlated with drawdowns (Cointelegraph / Forbes: pro & contra).
Distinction: Derivatives liquidations are not spot evidence; this article concerns CEX spot order books only.
Functional Principle
- Preparation: Identify thin bid depth and fragmentation (off-peak UTC, round numbers / local lows).
- Aggressive sell burst: A series of marketable sells (Market/IOC/FOK) hits the touch; sell-aggressor share surges, best bid is repeatedly walked down and down-tick runs lengthen.
- Amplifiers: Bid cancels, spread blowouts, lead/lag behaviour: a core venue falls first and others follow; stops and resting bids are picked off. Without fundamental pressure a rapid reversion often follows.
Distinct Detection Features (live observable)
- Sell-aggressor dominance: Notional-weighted share of aggressive sell trades ≥ P99 in 1/5-minute bins vs 30-day baseline.
- Bid-depth evaporation: Bid/Ask depth ratio (Top-5) ≤ P1; best-bid half-life ≤ P5.
- Spread jump + down-tick runs: Spread blows out (bps) while serial down-ticks push the mid lower.
- VWAP drift vs mid: VWAP ≪ mid (sell-driven, high impact).
- Cross-venue coherence: Lead/lag 0.5–1.0 s: core venue leads, ≥2 venues follow.
Why CEXs Are Vulnerable
- No auction close, 24/7: No closing auction with imbalance controls; off-peak windows are more vulnerable.
- Fees & VIP rebates: Fine-grained maker/taker economics can make aggressive sell sequences economically viable.
- Transparency limits: L2 often insufficient to see full cancel waves; hidden/iceberg orders distort apparent depth.
- Fragmentation: Different tick/lot/queue rules and latencies enable venue-selective attacks.
Comparison: Regulated Exchanges
Surveillance & duties: FINRA Rule 5210 addresses misleading publications/quotations; with SEC Rule 613 (CAT) order life-cycles (Order→Amend→Cancel→Trade) can be robustly attributed. Mechanical safeguards: volatility halts/collars & auctions reduce cascade risk. Result: bear raids are riskier and shorter-lived on regulated venues than on CEX spot.
Why Early Detection Matters - and What Changes in the EU
- MiCA timeline: In force 29 Jun 2023; applicable since 30 Jun 2024 (e.g. ART/EMT) and 30 Dec 2024 (CASP duties). Transitional windows up to 01 Jul 2026 may apply - leading to staggered supervision in 2025/26.
- Surveillance consequence: Intent-agnostic indicators (sell-aggressor, depth ratio, down-tick runs, spread jump, lead/lag) gain relevance in absence of a CAT equivalent.
- Practical benefit: Early warning reduces slippage/stop-outs, improves best-execution evidence and yields MiCA/MAR-ready dossiers.
Concrete Thresholds / Alert Rules (E3 / E2 / E1)
Baseline: 30-day history, hourly bins (UTC), ±15-minute tolerance per symbol×venue; percentile-based thresholds.
Metrics (selection): Sell-aggressor share, Bid/Ask depth ratio (Top-5), down-tick run length, spread jump (bps), VWAP drift vs mid (bps), OTR, best-bid t½ (ms), cancel rate at bid, lead/lag (1-s bins, ≥3 venues), round-size ratio, Benford distance (L1).
E3 – High (combined strong downward signature)
- Sell-aggressor share ≥ P99 and Bid/Ask depth ratio ≤ P1 and spread jump ≥ P99,
- Best-bid t½ ≤ P1 plus down-tick run length ≥ P99 within ≤ 2 min,
- VWAP drift vs mid ≤ P1 (strongly negative) with OTR ≥ P99,
- Cross-venue coherence: ≥ 3 venues trigger E2/E3 within ≤ 3 s of each other.
E2 – Medium (partial signals)
- Sell-aggressor share ≥ P98 or depth ratio ≤ P5,
- Spread jump ≥ P98 or down-tick run ≥ P98,
- Lead/lag deviation: one venue leads by > 700 ms across ≥ 5 consecutive 1-s bins.
E1 – Low (early warning)
- Rising bid cancel rate with sell-aggressor share ≥ P95,
- BBO changes/s ≥ P95 (flicker accompaniment) without a strong spread jump,
- Round-size clustering (Benford-L1 ≥ P90) in sell prints.
De-escalation: Downgrade when depth ratio returns ≥ P20, VWAP drift > P20 and down-tick run < P80 (within ≤ 10 min).
Practical Notes (Minimizing False Alarms)
- Event filters (UTC): Listings/relistings, maintenance, macro slots (CPI/FOMC), large on-chain transfers; treat perp-driven cascades only as context.
- Legitimate alternatives: Inventory reductions by large holders, TWAP/POV sell programs, OTC outflows hedged on spot - if reversion is absent and notional path is consistent, that argues against a bear raid.
- Cross-venue check: E3 only when coherent triggers appear on ≥ 3 venues; exclude single-venue glitches.
- Data quality: Discard windows with L2 gaps/errors > 1%; report measures in bps/ms, UTC-stamped with notional documented.
Why This Matters (Trader Benefit & Compliance)
- Execution & Risk: Early bear-raid detection protects stops, avoids unnecessary crossings and reduces slippage; improves limit placement.
- Alpha protection: Exploit reversion windows after artificial sell bursts; reduce turnover costs.
- Best-Execution & Supervision: Sequence dossiers (sell-aggressor, depth ratio, down-tick runs, spread jump, lead/lag) are audit-ready and support MiCA/MAR-compliant reporting.
Relevant Sources
- Business Insider – Ethereum had a flash crash - here’s what happened (22 Jun 2017).
- Fortune – Coinbase to Pay Back Ethereum Flash Crash Losses (26 Jun 2017).
- Bloomberg – Bitcoin Crashed 87% on Binance’s U.S. Exchange Due to Algo Bug (21 Oct 2021).
- CoinDesk – Bitcoin Price Flash Crash on Binance.US Attributed to Trader Algorithm Bug (21 Oct 2021).
- Cointelegraph – Mt. Gox sell-off reports (08 Mar 2018).
- Forbes – Blaming Mt. Gox... Doesn’t Compute (12 Mar 2018).
- Kaiko – Moving markets: liquidity and large sell orders (29 Aug 2024).
- ESMA – Statement on MiCA Transitional Measures (17 Dec 2024).